Illuminations

Essential media about the arts
Producer and publisher of television, films and DVDs
Kate Fleetwood + Patrick Stewart in Rupert Goold's production of Macbeth

This morning, Sunday, at around 8.30, we start filming Macbeth. Patrick Stewart is Macbeth, Kate Fleetwood Lady Macbeth and our director is Rupert Goold. This is the 2007 Chichester Festival Theatre production that went triumphantly to the West End and the Brooklyn Academy of Music and then played for twelve weeks on Broadway. Michael Billington called the production 'spellbinding', adding that 'Stewart has done nothing finer'; Charles Spencer in the Telegraph described it as 'brilliantly inventive, heart-stoppingly scary... the best Macbeth I've seen.' After our adventures this summer, now Seb and I are producing a television version of this Macbeth for Great Performances and WNET.org in the United States and for the BBC here. Good, eh?

Forgive us if -- just for today -- we skip 'Sunday stuff'. There's so much to say about Macbeth, and this morning at least, so little time. But we have three weeks of daily blogging in prospect, rather along the lines of our Hamlet reflections. Headlines? The all-important schedule is 18 days, exactly as on Hamlet. Because the play is a little shorter we need to average some eight minutes of completed footage a day -- and we begin with the 'England'  scene (Act IV Scene 3). There were one or two cast changes during the production's life but we have all of the key members returning for the film.

We're shooting once again with a RED camera (in fact, with two) and our director of photography is Sam McCurdy BSC. Rupert Goold has had an astonishing year on the stage, with Six Characters in Search of an Author on the road, and new productions of Time and the Conways, Enron and Turandot -- but this is is his first film. And you'll be relieved to know (as are we) that we have the same caterers as in the summer!

What we can't tell you is where we're filming, but it's a breath-taking location in the Midlands. We've been prepping here for the past few days, and yesterday all of the kit arrived, along with the mobile dressing rooms, costume truck, make-up van and more. There are some of our favourite colleagues among the crew and many new faces. All in all it's wonderful to be back on location.

Strangely for Seb and I, we've produced a Macbeth before: Greg Doran's compelling film of his Royal Shakespeare Company production with Antony Sher and Harriet Walter. We shot that at London's Roundhouse nine (!) years ago. As you might expect, Rupert's vision for this production is very different. If nothing else, you can anticipate a good deal of blood -- and it's no coincidence that among Sam's credits are the exceptional British horror films Dog Soldiers, 2002, and The Descent, 2005.

The bacon rolls are served from 7 this morning. The crew call is 8 and we hope to be turning over by 8.45. The set has very patchy mobile phone coverage but I'll aim to post an update later and if possible to Twitter too. I trust you'll enjoy the ride across the next three weeks -- I know that we will. And one of the things we'll be exploring here is previous television (and film) versions of the play. To whet you appetite, courtesy of the LIFE archive hosted by Google, this is a behind-the-scenes image of a BBC production mounted in 1949, exactly sixty years ago.

Update (around 8pm):
No more reassuring sight could greet us at the location just before 7am than Chris and Hughie from caterers Gentle Butler with coffee brewed and bacon sizzling. We have a crowd of some twenty extras in today, and many are already costumed in DJs and evening dresses. I introduce myself as the co-producer to a group of the men and offer a little background to this version of Macbeth. They look at me blankly, and I could as well have said I was an alien from Mars. I guess it's hard to care too much about the gig when you've had to get up around 4 this morning.

About ten to eight the crew is unpacking the seemingly hundreds of boxes of camera kit, of the dolly, of lenses, of sound equipment, of the hard disc recorders and all the other high-end technology that shooting on RED requires. We're in a beautiful spacious panelled room that was once a library, and our artificial afternoon sun is pouring in through the windows. Outside two of the sparks make adjustments to the really big lamps.

By now the sun has risen, bathing the clouds in pinks and oranges -- a beautiful morning. Inside, Oliver Birch at the piano and (for today) vocalist Hywel John -- they both have other, more significant roles -- are rehearsing a Schubert song. On stage the production used a popular track from the 1920s but we discovered that the film rights for this would cost several thousand pounds for each thirty second cue. The Schubert was Rupert's original choice, although it was replaced in rehearsal -- and as it's out of copyright we revert to it here.

One of the big differences from Hamlet is that we are working on set with a second camera, and so we have twin monitors mounted side-by-side. I'll return to all of the pros and cons of working with two cameras, which we have discussed almost obsessively over the past weeks, but our initial impression here is of speed and flexibility. Sam McCurdy's camera team quickly find their set-ups, and Sam himself makes small adjustments to the lighting that he has already pre-set.

We are rehearsing by 09.06, and at 09.29, our first assistant director Richard Styles says, 'Turn over'. 'Turning' and 'Sound running' are the responses, and then 'One, take one. A camera mark.' 'B camera.' And we're off with a wide establishing shot which runs for more than 90 seconds before we cut. At 10.25 we are on our third set-up, and everything feels very good. There is, however, a very very long way to go.

The focus for the morning is Malcolm, played by Scott Handy, being visited by Michael Feast as Macduff to persuade him to challenge Macbeth's corrupt and bloody rule. Scott was on stage at the Coliseum in London last night in Rupert's Turandot. We picked him up after the show and drove him to the unit hotel, so it was particularly heroic for him to be in by 8am. Not that you'd have any sense of that from his pitch-perfect performance.

We're doing well by lunchtime (a really excellent roast lamb, tasty-looking red mullet fillets and a mushroom and squash veggy option) and the weather holds up too. Cast and crew work hard right through the afternoon, releasing the extras as the drama increasingly focuses on Malcolm and Macduff, with Tim Treloar's Ross bringing grim news for them both.

It's more than eighteen months since the cast played the show, and they've had only four days of re-rehearsals since, but it's quickly apparent that they are all still completely on top of their roles. This is the wonderful thing about filming an achieved stage production -- the actors have refined every nuance and inflection, and there are no hesitations or interruptions over the performances.

By the wrap at three minutes shy of seven we've done 36 set-ups (18 on each of the cameras) and completed everything we had scheduled. Which is just great for a first day -- and for a scene that will last for some 10 minutes or more in the final film. We go back to the hotel happy, relieved and slightly surprised that -- thanks to exigencies of availabilities -- tomorrow is a rest day.

Related posts: 'What, sir, not yet at rest?' 23 November / 'Our point of second meeting' 24 November

Comments

Caro (22 November 2009 4:28 am)

Hooray! I'd long to see the production when it was in NYC, but wasn't able to make the cross-country trip for various reasons. I'm very much looking forward to this.

bex (22 November 2009 4:41 am)

John- this is fantastic news ! I look forward to following the filming as I did Hamlet. I didn't get a chance to see this in New York, so I'm pleased as punch to know that I'll be able to see it now.

(does this mean that there could be a chance for Love's Labours Lost ?)

Ku (22 November 2009 5:04 am)

Wonderful! Another magnificent production being transferred to the small screen. Can't wait for the updates and the final product! :)

Michele Fry (22 November 2009 5:18 am)

Wow! I may actually find the nerve to watch a production of Macbeth once this is out on DVD...

Iney (22 November 2009 8:45 am)

After reading yesterdays tweed I didn't really know what to expect. I was half hoping for Twelfs Night, but since it's about to transfer to London (or is there already) I knew it couldn't be that. I did not expect another Macbeth. Having said that I am delighted. Patrick Stewart is such an amazing shakespearian actor, and the rest of the cast list looks great too. I'm also delighted that another classic drama has been commissioned by the BBC. Might there be hope yet for B.Stephenson? I'm looking forward to reading about the progress of the filming over the next 3 weeks, and dare we hope for some lunch menus?
I have to admit I do not know anything about Macbeth (apart from some strange reference to the play in Blackadder). So maybe this is the time to order one of Rsc's textbooks! Anyway I'm looking forward to the finished product. All the best to everyone involved! Might this be part 2 of the quatercentary Complete Works of Shakespeare?

Gail (22 November 2009 9:41 am)

Oh John this is fantastic news!

Macbeth is my second favourite play (after Hamlet) and although I've seen several stage versions I was not able to see this one.

I shall look forward to your updates as much as I did during the making of Hamlet.

Dare I hope that this will become a series for the BBC? Am I too optimistic in hoping for last year's RSC production of Love's Labours Lost to be considered??

Iney (22 November 2009 10:22 am)

I knew youtube was good for some things- after 1 hour (and 2 cups of coffee) i learned that Macbeth is a play about obsession, savagery and brutality. I just watched 3 witches bury a cut off hand. This is not for the faint-hearted (like me), is it? However I am intrigued by the soviet twist of this version, I hear it's set in Russia during the cold war period - a bit of travelling back to my childhood behind the iron curtain (although that was in the 80's and not the 50's where this play is said to be set). It just shows how contemporary Shakespeare's work is.
I've also learned that in the phrase "tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow" the most important word is and. Currently that means very little to me, as I have to learn a lot more about this play.
And I have to agree with Bex and Gail- apart from Twelfs Night I would love to see Love's Labours Lost made into film, although I think this is just wishful thinking. But then again- there is still time left till 2016 for the Complete Works!

Buzz (22 November 2009 10:27 am)

AWSOME!!!!!!!!! You kept that quite!

Macbeth was never one of my favorite plays (bit to dark and gory for me) but after just seeing your production with Antony Sher which was Brilliant! Antony Sher was Fantastic!!! I'm really looking forward to this!

I heard such good reviews about it and especially Patricks performance. So Have Fun, Good luck and enjoy lunch!

Caroline (22 November 2009 11:18 am)

Fantastic!
I was metapohorically putting money on it being Macbeth you were up to (as Iney said - Twelfth Night is a little busy at the moment!)

I'm looking forward to the next three weeks of blogging and tweeting (how strange that sentence would have looked only a few years ago) and mouthwatering menus I hope. And of course to seeing the finished product in due course.

I'll just add my tremulous little voice to the clamour for Love's Labours Lost. There were far too few performances of that wonderful production by the RSC!

Anyway -for now - Macbeth!

Debbie (22 November 2009 11:35 am)

I can't tel you how happy this makes me. i saw the production on Broadway and it was incredible. The production managed to bring out the black comedy aspects as well as the tragedy and horrow.

Debbie (22 November 2009 11:38 am)

That shoulld have been horror. It's too early here.

Jill (22 November 2009 1:46 pm)

How very exciting!! There was a noticeably non-committal comment from John previously, so I did have my suspicions! :-)

I think this is an excellent choice and I'm looking forward to following along via the blog, even if it does leave me looking sadly at my own deficient lunches.

@John - are there any things you are planning to do differently this time, building on your Hamlet experiences? Having many of the same crew must help it along.

Ruth (22 November 2009 2:01 pm)

Wonderful news!. I was hoping/half expecting it to be news about a future filming of Twelfth Night, but I'll keep my fingers crossed that that might yet be to come. In the meantime this is great.

Best wishes that it all goes smoothly, and this will be another treat to look forward to. Do you have any idea yet when it might be broadcast?

Zoe (22 November 2009 2:37 pm)

What wonderful news! Looks like I got back on line just in time! My loyal but very old computer finally died on me and went to that geat computer workshop in the sky - I was upset because I missed What Is Beauty? (17th Dec blog) and I was unable to watch it on iplayer becouse my present computer doesn't have any sound - hopefully I will be back in the twenty first century very soon.

I had a couple of things to say today: I went to see Twelfth Night a couple of weeks ago, I will write a review, also I am listening to my Shakespeare Live Discs and I will let you know which are my favourite tracks ( Hamlet of course will be one of them!)

All this can wait though, because your news is much more exciting. I saw your excellent TV prodution of Macbeth with Anthony sher, so I shall look forward to this. I shall look forward to the daily blog too (especially the lunch menu!).

A little bit of fan girl news: I was having lunch in a cafe' in London, the other day and who should walk in and have lunch at the next table, Patrick Stewart!! I keep telling my friends, 'I had lunch with Patrick Stewart, he just didn't know that he was having lunch with me!'.

Margot (22 November 2009 3:14 pm)

Oh, this is brilliant news! Although I live near Chichester I was unable to see this production but friends who did see it were blown away. Right, that's next year's Christmas present sorted, my husband can buy me the DVD - it will be on DVD, right?

This is exciting stuff, having some more classy stuff to watch on mainstream TV. Hooray!

Yes, John, I think you can tell we're all very pleased with the news!

CeCe (22 November 2009 3:18 pm)

How exciting ! First question (of many no doubt!) is :- how long has it taken to get to this point ? and how 'easy' is it for PS & the rest of the cast to remember how they played a character some two years after the event ?

Macbeth was the first ever Shakespeare play I read at school, so I will have to do some revision on the finer points, but as others have said, PS being the fine actor he is, this will definately be worth watching. I feel I should also see Anthony Sher's version as he too is a fantastic actor. I think my Xmas DVD wish list just got longer... :-)

And you're shooting in the Midlands - my neck of the woods! I hope it goes without saying that if you need a spare pair of hands for anything at all, you only need ask !! :-)

bex (22 November 2009 3:39 pm)

John- when I posted a note to my blog that you had begun filming Macbeth my friends all got very excited. None, in the UK or the US, had gotten to see it and an opportunity to see a new production of Hamlet, with such an outstanding cast, made them all very happy (I have a lot of Shakespeare geeks for friends :).

But of course the discussion eventually veered towards whether this bodes well for the potential for you to take on LLL. We all thought that the fact that this Macbeth wasn't planned from the beginning (as the Hamlet seems to have been even though noone would fess-up til it was upon us) bodes well for LLL. One friend, an RSC member who lives in London gave me permission to copy/paste her comment in here:

"I would love to have LLL filmed, I adored it and although it was overshadowed by the Hamlet-love, it got great reviews. I went in knowing nothing about it apart from some people warning me it was 'difficult' and 'not often done' because of it. I don't know how it has been done before, because I can't tell you how much I laughed and found it pretty easy to keep up with. In fact at one point I thought the guy sitting next to me was going to fall off his seat laughing it was that funny. I would certainly get behind any kind of campaign for this because it really was that good and sadly overlooked."

my added 2cents is that, as far as I can tell in my librarian-hat searching, there are only 2 or 3 filmed versions of LLL and it seems to me another is needed :)

bex (22 November 2009 3:50 pm)

I should not be allowed to type before 9am...

"an opportunity to see a new production of Hamlet, with such an outstanding cast, "

should, of course, read 'a new production of Macbeth'

yeesh... off to finish my coffee.

Caroline (22 November 2009 4:03 pm)

@bex - don't worry I hadn't even noticed your mentioning the wrong play - I just went with your sentiment!


And further to your friend's comments on LLL I took my then 13 year old to see it, fearful that most of it would go over her head, as I too had heard it was 'difficult and rarelty performed'.
I needn't have worried as she too was nearly falling off her chair with laughter at several points. She still talks about it now.

Hope those who make decisions about such things are aware of the feelings of so many people on this matter.

Strophe (22 November 2009 5:28 pm)

Oh wonderful! I'm really looking forward to seeing what you do with this.

Karen M (22 November 2009 7:50 pm)

This is really good news as I didn't see this production either so now I will be able too. My daughter studied Macbeth in year 6 and would like to see it too.

I was wondering whether it would be LLL that was to be filmed or Twelfth Night.

I look forward to reading the updates on the filming each day.

Caro (22 November 2009 8:28 pm)

@bex "my added 2cents is that, as far as I can tell in my librarian-hat searching, there are only 2 or 3 filmed versions of LLL and it seems to me another is needed :)"

I would love it, too -- I'd originally hoped to make it to Stratford last October and see both Hamlet & LLL with my husband, but circumstances ended up being London in January on my own and Hamlet only. Not that I regret the trip (which was incredible for everything including the play), but I'd love to see that production filmed. I hope that's in the offing, though with a certain actor off to film a pilot in the US, I can't see it happening soon. (I promise that we don't take their passports away and we will send him back in good condition, especially if LLL could be arranged. ;) )

Anne C (22 November 2009 8:42 pm)

Delighted to hear about the Macbeth production, and I hope this is the start of many more such productions in the future - maybe the start of a trend?

I missed LLL, so I would love to see it, though I suspect it's unlikely...

John Wyver (22 November 2009 8:57 pm)

Many thanks for your comments and interest. They're brilliant. I'll post again with some specific answers, but I have to say now -- definitively -- there are absolutely no plans to film LLL, we've never discussed it, and I really truly don't think it can or will happen. Sorry.

CeCe (22 November 2009 10:21 pm)

I didn't see LLL last year either, so I'll have to take everyone's word for it that it would have been worth filming.
However, given our previous conversations about the lack of classic theatre being filmed, I am more than happy to see anything we can get. We are SO lucky in the UK with the wealth of talent we can draw upon in terms of writers, actors and production teams.

I know you've only just started "The Scottish Play" but here's to your powers of persuasion for future projects John ! :-) Enjoy the day off tomorrow (if you actually get any rest!)

Annette (23 November 2009 8:56 am)

Exciting stuff!!! Already I'm drawn in by your vivid description of the day's proceedings - and I'm saying this despite myself. There was initial reluctance...

Macbeth?! Of course, it's a brilliant play and I'm sure Patrick Stewart was and will be wonderful in the role but Tony Sher's harrowing performance is still very fresh, raw and unnerving in my mind - an open wound sustained a few months ago, not nine years.

It prompted a rare, wildly and unreservedly enthusiastic response which - unlike my exploded marshmallow reaction brought on by some beautiful art and music the other day - hasn't dissolved in the flood of new experiences. I feel just as strongly about this powerful production now, as I did when I first saw it. I suspect I wouldn't say the same about Welles and Polanski's versions - which I might have to revisit.

Also, secretly, I was hoping for Richard III with Kevin Spacey (who even turned a Minolta ad into a poignant piece of art).

And yet, and yet...I know I will be completely captivated by every word you write about the filming, this new adventure and bemoan the day it's all over and the long wait for the dvd begins! Thank you.

Karen (23 November 2009 1:58 pm)

I know I am tardy finding this wonderful news (friend's birthday yesterday!)

Macbeth is my favourite play since studying it for my O'Level English Lit. I know the play so well and love it. It will always hold a special place in my literary heart.

Oh this is just about the best news I have heard since Hamlet was announced! And with the reproduction of the Chichester cast too. I sadly missed every opportunity to watch it first time round. So this will more than make up for it. I know someone who did see the play with Patrick in the West End and still raves about it now. I have been reliving it vacariously through her memories. Now I will be able to see it myself. I've got goosebumps just thinking about it!

John, I hope all goes well for a successful filming with few hiccups....

Jill (23 November 2009 2:28 pm)

@Annette - I know what you mean about Kevin Spacey/Richard III but as John had teased with possibility that I was pretty sure we wouldn't get it... yet! But in any case, I think what is really good about both the Hamlet and Mabeth films is that they are of 'already achieved stage productions' as John puts it in the update to today's blog. The casts have been honing their interpretations over many performances, unlike a film or one-off TV performance. Additionally, both these productions were critically acclaimed.

So, to get a RIII with Spacey: get him to put it on at the Old Vic, wait for the (undoubtedly) brilliant reviews, wait a year and then - hey presto - as if by magic, Illuminations translates it onto the screen for our (further) enjoyment. Simple!

:-)


If we go the non-Shakespeare-route, there is Mr Goold's "Six Characters in Search of an Author" but the director's DVD commentary of the director's DVD commentary would Melt My Brain.

John Wyver (23 November 2009 2:44 pm)

@ Jill [1]: re doing things differently this time around... one of the key differences is having a second camera on set -- I'm going to post about that in more detail tomorrow.

@ Jill [2]: we were just talking about Six Characters...

K (23 November 2009 9:17 pm)

Great news John. I've heard lots about that production of Macbeth but hadn't seen it myself (I wasn't a theatre goer back then) so really look forward to seeing it.

As for Six Characters...I've not seen the other posts about it, but I saw it a couple of months ago. Somewhere I saw it reviewed as 'bizarre, baffling and brilliant' I wholeheartedly agree with the first two. I think I agree with 'brilliant'....it's certainly stuck with me since then even though I didn't fully understand it!

Julia S. (23 November 2009 9:34 pm)

BEST NEWS EVER. I remember hearing Stewart on the Leonard Lopate radio show and wishing with all my heart I could see this production in the theater. Someday, I can see a version of it in my home!!!1! SO EXCITED!

Jill (24 November 2009 12:32 pm)

@John - when you say you were talking about "Six Characters..." was this in the context of a possible new project, or something a bit more theoretical, eg how would it be possible to transfer it to a film? I imagine it would conceptually be more of a challenge than Hamlet or Macbeth.

I'm intrigued about the pros and cons of single v. two camera work. I look forward to reading about it when you have some time. I expect the beginning of a new shoot is an exceptionally busy time for you.

Jayne (25 November 2009 7:40 pm)

I am looking forward so much to reading about the next 18 days! This was a production I didn't get to see and at the time was extremely disappointed. I can't wait to have a copy of this!

I look forward to the blogs!
Great news about this production, \john,

Jayne;)

greg knowles (23 December 2009 7:03 pm)

wow what an experience i was an extra on this shoot and had the best time of my life. The actors were amazing and the whole thing definately opened my eyes ...... brilliant and cheers for the experience
greg

Leave a reply

Favorite Posts

'Both at the first and now...' [Updated]
Initial previews for Hamlet, plus other reactions and blogs

Blogging the Bard
Links to all the Hamlet posts

Blogging the Bard II: Macbeth
A round-up of posts from making Macbeth

China 18: that's a wrap(-up)
All the posts from China

Towards 2016: [3] the Big Idea
The campaign starts here for a quatercentenary Complete Works

For the poet Brian Jones
A brief appreciation of the poet and teacher

Latest Entries

Masterful minimal Macbeth
Thames Television's version of Trevor Nunn's production

Sunday links
The death of Margaret Dale, the light of films and...

Unwelcome 'ghosts'
The '79 Macbeth: a suitable case for digital treatment?

Terribly, terribly good
Four Granada productions of Noel Coward from 1964

»