Sunday links

9th January 2022

John Wyver writes: two political articles to kick off this week’s selection, both wonderfully written, even if their content is so familiarly depressing; there are more cheerful recommendations below the fold, and as ever I’n grateful for those on Twitter whose recommendations pop up in my timeline.

PS. The previous selection was Tuesday, which perhaps accounts for a certain sparseness (is that a word?) and austerity here.

How Britain Falls Apart: Tom McTague for The Atlantic, with exceptional photos by Robbie Lawrence (including ‘Morning traffic crosses Westminster Bridge, London’, above); this is the compelling lede:

The grim reality for Britain as it faces up to 2022 is that no other major power on Earth stands quite as close to its own dissolution. Given its recent record, perhaps this should not be a surprise. In the opening two decades of the 21st century, Britain has effectively lost two wars and seen its grand strategy collapse, first with the 2008 financial crisis, which blew up its social and economic settlement, and, then, in 2016, when the country chose to rip up its long-term foreign policy by leaving the European Union, achieving the rare feat of erecting an economic border with its largest trading partner and with a part of itself, Northern Ireland, while adding fuel to the fire of Scottish independence for good measure. And if this wasn’t enough, it then spectacularly failed in its response to the coronavirus pandemic, combining one of the worst death rates in the developed world with one of the worst economic recessions.

Boris Johnson leaves a scar on all who deal with him: brilliant writing from Matthew Parris in The Times.

How A Raisin in the Sun made Sidney Poitier’s Broadway legacy unforgettable: ‘It is impossible to overestimate Sidney Poitier’s Hollywood legacy,’ is how Charles McNulty begins this tribute for LA Times to the great actor who died this week; there have been many exceptional tributes published over the past few days, and this – which is mostly about the actor’s work on stage – is one of the best…

• How Peter Bogdanovich shaped the backstory of modern cinema: … while this, by Richard Brody for The New Yorker, is one of the pieces you need to read to understand the significance of the historian and filmmaker who we also lost this week.

‘Dames, Janes, Dolls, and Canaries – Woman Stars of the Pre-Code Era’: this looks like a terrific season, curated by Farran Nehme, at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, with programme notes online about many of its rarities.

Defiance through form: here’s an interesting article, from by Sofie Cato Maas, that introduces an area of filmmaking that I doubt very much you’ve encountered before: the Romanian avant-garde of the 1970s and 1980s.

Mark Rylance: ‘Theatre is a thousand times more enjoyable than film’: a fascinating Guardian interview by Charlotte Higgins.

Colm Tóibín: “I think, ‘I must be deep.’ Then I think, ‘Stop this nonsense, get on with the story’”: let the New Statesman subheading introduce this terrific piece by Leo Robson – ‘The Irish novelist on writing after chemotherapy, growing up gay “in the 19th century”, and winning the 2021 David Cohen Prize for Literature.’

The Colston Four’s critics are deluded to think Britain owes no apology for its past: Nesrine Malik spot-on:

It is a trick that is constantly played by those who view British history as an objective and inoffensive series of facts that must be preserved for the record, rather than a living legacy of supremacy, both racial and national, that many are still invested in, and that still resides not just in our streets and squares but in our politics, our education and our economy. Most crucially when it comes to Colston’s statue, it resides in our government.

Are New Towns a thing of the past? [£, but limited free access with registration]: for Apollo, Gillian Darley celebrates past successes and asks some questions about the future of planning.

Workers telling their own stories can rebuild working-class pride: Alberto Prunett for Jacobin is very good on Didier Eribon’s Returning to Reims and the new film developed from it, Retour a Reims (Fragments), and on working-class writing and reading.

Kim & Kanye & Pete & Julia: Naomi Fry at The New Yorker puts her finger on this week’s zeitgeist (and introduces me to a new and useful acronym).

In praise of search tools: a very rich review response by Deidre Lynch for Public Books to Dennis Duncan’s Index, A History of the, and Craig Robertson’s The Filing Cabinet: A Vertical History of Information...

Paper jamming: … while for LA Review of Books, Matthew Kirschenbaum is also very good on Tamara Shopsin’s first novel, LaserWriter II:

LaserWriter II is a throwback to a time when your computer wasn’t constantly watching you or selling you or even, however indifferently, trying to kill you. Tech wasn’t inherently evil or so it seemed, and it was actually okay, even hip, to stan a Silicon Valley company. Icons instead of emoji embodied the range of affective relations the machine could conjure, enough for these diminutive yet somehow endearing boxes and lozenges that still reposed modestly on our desk as opposed to intimately in our pockets, machines that were not always on, not always online, that were sometimes even (incredibly) turned off altogether. The computer was not an alter ego, not a platform, not a metaverse; it wasn’t even particularly smart. It was a tool — an appliance — the word processor having that in common with the food processor. And like any appliance, it could be fixed.

The last-ditch, non-result, dead-rubber draw: there’s nothing like this: I tend not to include sports writing here, in part because so much of it feels (even if it isn’t) of the moment and ephemeral, but this is an appropriately glorious column by the Guardian’s Barney Ronay about the extraordinary climax of the Fourth Test.

• And back to British politics, this was the Twitter thread that resonated most strongly for me this week:


  1. John Wyver says:

    Thanks, Billy – I thought my “token” link would work but obviously not. Much appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *